Saturday, Jul 4
Tutorials | Overview | User Guide | FAQ | Contact/Help | News | Data Quality | File Structure | CDS R/D | Sponsorship | More...

PSID Data Quality Bibliography

Collecting and distributing high quality data in a user friendly manner is the central focus of the PSID. Quality manifests itself on three dimensions: accurate measurement of outcomes; appropriate editing and cleaning of the data once it is collected; user friendly distribution of the data and documentation.

To obtain the highest quality data possible, we are continuously reassessing data collection methods. The most substantial recent innovation is the use of Event History Calendars, which debut in the PSID in 2003. Randomized experimental analysis of EHC methods has found that retrospective reports are more accurately assessed using the EHC techniques.

The quality of the PSID data have been examined in numerous studies. Below you will find a list of these studies addressing each topical area.


  • Charitable Giving

Wilhelm, Mark O. 2007. The Quality and Comparability of Survey Data on Charitable Giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36; 65-84.

  • Education

Falaris, Evangelos, and Elizabeth Peters. 1998. Survey Attrition and Schooling Choices. The Journal of Human Resources 33, no. 2: 531-54.

  • Event History Calendar Methods

Bell, R.F., Lee, E.H., Stafford, F. P., Chou, C-H (under review).  Event history calendar interviewing improves the reporting of when events happened.

Belli, R.F., Shay, W.L., & Stafford, F.P. (2001).  Event history calendars and question list surveys: A direct comparison of interviewing methods.  Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 45-74.

Belli, R. F. (2000). Computerized event history calendar methods: Facilitating autobiographical recall. American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods (pp.471-475). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

Belli, R. F. (1998). The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory, 6, 383-406.

  • Health

Gouskova, Elena, and Robert F. Schoeni. 2002. Analysis of the Quality of the Health Data in the PSID.

Levy, Helen. 2007. Health Insurance Data in the PSID.

Lillard, Lee, and Melissa M. Farmer. 1997. Linking Medicare and National Survey Data. Annals of Internal Medicine 127: 691-95.

Lillard, Lee. 1995. Research on Aging Using the PSID, RAND DRU-939, NSF/PSID. Santa Monica, CA.  Notes:  PSID Board Commissioned Papers--Design Options for Next Funding Cycle.  

Smith, James P. 1994. New Directions in Socioeconomic Research on Aging. Aging and Quality of Life., Chapter 15, Pages 275-94. ed. Ronal P. Abeles. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co., Inc.

  • Housework

Achen, Alexandra C, and Frank P. Stafford. 2005. Data Quality of Housework Hours in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics: Who Really Does the Dishes?

  • Income and Demographics

Becketti, Sean, William Gould, Lee Lillard, and Finis Welch. 1988. The PSID after Fourteen Years: an Evaluation. Journal of Labor Economics 6, no. 4: 472-92.

Bound, John, Charles Brown, Greg J. Duncan, and Willard Rodgers. 1994. Evidence on the Validity of Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Labor Market Data. Journal of Labour Economics 12, no. 3: 345-68.

Bound, John, Charles Brown, Greg J. Duncan, and Willard Rodgers.1990. Measurement Error in Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Labor Market Surveys: Validation Study Evidence. In Panel Data and Labor Studies., 1-19. eds. J. Hartog, G. Ridder, and J. Theeuwes. B. V. (North Holland): Elsevier Science Publishers.

Duncan, Greg J., and Daniel H. Hill. 1989. Assessing the Quality of Household Panel Survey Data: The Case of the PSID. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7, no. 4: 441-51.

Duncan, Greg J., and Daniel H. Hill. 1985. An Investigation of the Extent and Consequences of Measurement Error in Labor Economic Survey Data. Journal of Labor Economics 3, no. 4: 508-22.

Duncan, Greg J., Timothy M. Smeeding, and Willard Rodgers. 1995. Household Income Dynamics in the 1970s and 1980s. Working Paper.

Fitzgerald, John, Peter Gottschalk, and Robert Moffitt. 1998. An Analysis of the Impact of Sample Attrition on the Second Generation of Respondents in the Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics. The Journal of Human Resources 33, no. 2: 300-344.

Fitzgerald, John, Peter Gottschalk, and Robert Moffitt. 1998. An Analysis of Sample Attrition in Panel Data. The Journal of Human Resources 33, no. 2: 251-99.

Kim, Yong-Seong and Staffore, Frank P. 2000. The Quality of PSID Income Data in the 1990’s and Beyond

Lillard, Lee, and Constantijn W. A. Panis 1998. Panel Attrition from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. The Journal of Human Resources 33, no. 2: 437-57.

PSID Users' Guide Chapter 5 on Data Quality.

Ratcliffe, Caroline, et. al. 2007. Assessing Asset Data on Low-Income Households: Current Availability and Options for Improvement. A Report in the Series Poor Finances: Assets and Low-Income Households. The Urban Institute; Center for Social Development Washington University in St. Louis.

Rendall, Michael S. 1997. Identifying and Misidentifying Single Mothers in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. The Journal of Human Resources 32, no. 3: 596-610.

Rodgers, Willard, Charles Brown, and Greg J. Duncan. 1993. Errors in Survey Reports of Earnings, Hours Worked and Hourly Wages. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, no. 424: 1208-18.

Zabel, Jeffrey. 1998. An Analysis of Attrition in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and the Survey of Income and Program Participation with an Application to a Model of Labor Market Behavior. The Journal of Human Resources 33, no. 2: 479-506.

Ziliak, James P., and T. J. Kniesner. 1998. The Importance of Sample Attrition in Life Cycle Labor Supply Estimation. The Journal of Human Resources 33, no. 2: 507-30.

  • Marriage

Lillard, Lee, and Linda Waite. 1990. Panel Versus Retrospective Data on Marital Histories: Lessons from the PSID. Individuals and Families in Transition: Understanding Change Through Longitudinal Data. editors H. V. Beaton, D. A. Ganni, and D. T. Frankel U.S. Bureau of the Census.

PSID Users' Guide Chapter 5 on Data Quality.

  • Sampling Issues

Brown, Charles. 1996. Notes on the "SEO" or "Census" Component of the PSID.

  • Wealth

Curtin, Richard T., F. Thomas Juster, and James N. Morgan. 1989. Survey Estimates of Wealth: An Assessment of Quality. Measurement of Savings, Investment, and Wealth. eds. Robert Lipsey, and Helen Stone. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Edward N. Wolff , "The Size Distribution of Wealth in the United States: A Comparison among Recent Household Surveys," in James P. Smith and Robert J. Willis editors, Wealth, Work, and Health: Innovations in Measurement in the Social Sciences, 1999, pp. 209-232. The article has been edited for form and style and to make it consistent with the other chapters in this book.

Juster, F. Thomas, James P. Smith, and Frank Stafford. 1999. The Measurement and Structure of Household Wealth. Labour Economics 6: 253-75.

PSID Users' Guide Chapter 5 on Data Quality.

 



Institute for Social Research | University of Michigan | Privacy | Conditions of Use