Tuesday, Nov 24
Tutorials | Overview | User Guide | FAQ | Contact/Help | News | Data Quality | File Structure | CDS R/D | Sponsorship | More...

The PSID Users Guide

 

MONOGRAPH PURPOSE AND CONTENT

This monograph describes the origins, design, procedures, and broad analytical potential of one of the major data bases in the social sciences--the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). After a brief review of the PSID's background, the monograph discusses the major design parameters, field procedures, and data preparation activities. These chapters describe the data collection process and serve as important background for understanding how PSID data come into being and what they represent. Issues of the quality of PSID data are addressed next, reporting evidence about a number of different quality dimensions. The remainder of the monograph delves into the data themselves--what topics are covered; what data files are available; and crucial information regarding analysis issues, key variables, and choice of data files. The "Data Analysis" chapter provides details of several analysis examples, so that the reader can see the assembly of parts needed to create estimates of earnings regressions, long-run poverty status, changes in women's income following divorce, and correlations between parents' income and a child's adult income. The monograph takes the reader from the drawing board to a completed product with a minimum of detail. Where most applicable, it notes other PSID documents, such as the PSID's documentation books and User Guide, that can provide further details about particular aspects of the study. In the final chapter, information is provided about obtaining these documents and the data files themselves. Throughout the monograph italics are used to distinguish terms with special meaning in the context of the PSID, and full capital letters are used to designate PSID variable names.

OVERVIEW OF THE PSID

The Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) is a longitudinal survey of a representative sample of U.S. individuals (men, women, and children) and the families in which they reside. It has been ongoing since 1968. Data are collected annually, and the data files contain the full span of information collected over the course of the study. PSID data can be used for cross-sectional, longitudinal and intergenerational analyses, and for studying both individuals and families. The study emphasizes the dynamic aspects of economic and demographic behavior, but it contains a wide range of measures, including sociological and psychological ones. Between 1968 and 1988, the PSID collected information regarding approximately 37,500 individuals and spanning as much as 21 years of their lives. The general design and core content of the study have remained largely unchanged, and considerable effort has been expended cleaning the data. These two features greatly enhance the PSID's potential for longitudinal analysis. Preparation and distribution of comprehensive documentation and a User Guide also facilitate use of the PSID data. The study has been conducted at the Survey Research Center, University of Michigan since its beginning in 1968, with the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) data archive handling the public distribution of the data files, documentation, and User Guide. PSID data files have been disseminated widely throughout the United States and to numerous foreign countries. Starting with a national sample of approximately 4,800 U.S. households in 1968, the PSID has traced individuals from those households since that time, whether or not they are living in the same dwelling or with the same people. Adults have been followed as they have grown older, and children have been observed as they advance through childhood and into adulthood, forming families of their own. Each year information is collected about the PSID's sample members (members of the PSID's 1968 sample families or their offspring) and their current co-residents (spouses, cohabitors, children, and others living with them), even if those co-residents were not part of original-sample families. Because the original focus of the study was on the dynamics of poverty, the 1968 sample included a disproportionately large number of low-income households. The oversampling of families poor in the late 1960s resulted in a sizable sub-sample of blacks. Probability-of-selection weights enable analysts to make estimates from the sample that are representative of the U.S. population. In the absence of nonresponse bias, the PSID's rules for tracking individuals and families over time lead to accurate representation of the nonimmigrant U.S. population both cross-sectionally each year, and in terms of change, since 1968. To help correct for omissions in representing post-1968 immigrants, a representative sample of 2,043 Latino (Mexican, Cuban, and Puerto Rican) households was added in 1990. The study's tracking rules, along with its Latino subsample addition in 1990, have meant substantial increases in the number of individuals in the study as it has progressed through time. In 1968 the PSID gathered information about approximately 18,000 individuals; by 1988 this number had grown to a cumulative total of about 37,500. Similarly, the number of family units has increased from just under 5,000 at the beginning of the study to about 7,000 currently, not including Latino households. The PSID provides a wide variety of information at the family and individual level, as well as some information about the locations in which sample households reside. The central focus of the data is economic and demographic, with substantial detail on income sources and amounts, employment, family composition changes, and residential location. Content of a more sociological or psychological nature is also included in some waves of the study. Information gathered in the survey applies to the circumstances of the family unit as a whole (e.g., type of housing) and to particular persons in the family unit (e.g., age, earnings). Some data are collected about all individuals in the family unit, but the most extensive data are gathered for the family head (who is male in married-couple families, but female or male otherwise) and wife. Information about the study's core topics (e.g., income, employment, family composition) is gathered annually, and this is supplemented with data on additional topics (e.g., health, wealth, retirement plans, flows of time and money help among families and their friends, and motivation and efficacy) gathered intermittently. The amount and variety of data are substantial; over 300 pages are required to list, by topic and wave, the variables on the study's main, cross-year data file. The PSID staff merges each new wave of data with prior waves to provide comprehensive coverage of information collected for individuals and families over the entire course of the study. These multi-wave data files become publicly available upon completion of the merging, numerous data-quality checks, and generation of variables. This usually occurs 18-24 months following the completion of interviewing.

ORIGIN OF THE PSID

As part of Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty, the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) directed the U.S. Bureau of the Census to conduct a nationwide assessment of the extent to which the War on Poverty was affecting people's economic well-being. This Census study, called the Survey of Economic Opportunity (SEO), completed interviews with about 30,000 households, first in 1966, and again in 1967. Interest in continuing this national study of economic well-being led OEO to approach the Survey Research Center (SRC) at the University of Michigan about interviewing a subsample of approximately 2,000 low-income SEO households. Professor James N. Morgan, who became the new study's director at SRC, argued successfully for adding a fresh cross-section of households from the SRC national sampling frame so that the new study would be representative of the entire population of the United States, including non-poor as well as poor households. It was also decided to follow, and keep as part of the sample, members of the families who moved away from their original households to set up new households, such as children who came of age during the study. In this way, the sample could remain representative of the nation's families and individuals over time. The study came to be known as the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. It began interviewing in 1968, successfully completing interviews with 4,802 households across 40 states--1,872 low-income households from the SEO plus 2,930 households drawn from the SRC national sampling frame. The year 1991 marked the study's 24th annual wave of interviewing, with its family units having substantially increased in number and having spread to cover all 50 states as well as some other countries.

ADMINISTRATION AND FUNDING

The PSID has been funded principally by a collection of federal agencies, including the Office of Economic Opportunity; the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (now Health and Human Services); the Departments of Labor and Agriculture; the National Science Foundation; the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD); and the National Institute on Aging (NIA). The Ford, Sloan, and Rockefeller foundations have provided important supplementary grants to the PSID. Since 1983, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has been the principal sponsor of the study, with substantial continuing support from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) of the Department of Health and Human Services. Since 1982, the study has had an advisory Board of Overseers, created by the National Science Foundation to foster input from the national community of scholars, researchers and policy makers. Throughout its history, the PSID has been conducted at the Survey Research Center, which is located within the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. Professor James N. Morgan, now emeritus, directed the study from 1968-1989. Beginning in 1982, Professor Greg J. Duncan became co-director, and subsequently director when Professor Morgan retired in 1989.

ILLUSTRATIVE USES OF THE PSID

Two key features give the PSID its unique analytic power: (i) individuals are followed over very long time periods and in the context of their family setting; and (ii) families are tracked across generations, with interviews often conducted simultaneously with multiple generations of the same families. The type of information the study collects, in conjunction with these unique qualities, builds a number of strengths, including the following: These features make the PSID one of the most widely used and influential data sets in the social science research community. Some 200 institutions have requested copies of the PSID data. And over 700 publications using PSID data have appeared in economic, demographic and sociological journals and books. The data are also extensively used for dissertations, reports, conference presentations, and working papers. A comprehensive bibliography is available from the PSID staff upon request (see final section of this monograph). Areas of basic economic research addressed with the data include: labor supply, consumption, life-cycle earnings, unions, compensating wage differentials, dynamic aspects of income distribution and various methodological studies. PSID topics of interest to researchers in several disciplines--demographers, sociologists, psychologists, and economists--include poverty and welfare experiences during adulthood or childhood; motivation and economic mobility; changes in family structure (e.g., births, divorce, remarriage); child support; out-of-wedlock births; teenage childbearing; and the intergenerational transmission of economic status. This diversity of topics reflects the philosophy of the PSID to ask limited sets of questions about a wide variety of topics rather than extensive questions about only a few topics. The study's multi-faceted information is couched in the context of substantial detail about income, employment, and family composition.
 



Institute for Social Research | University of Michigan | Privacy | Conditions of Use